How it worksLive demoCompareBlogFAQPricingGitHub
Compare / HeliconeChecked October 11, 2026
Compare · Helicone

LLMBrake vs Helicone

Per-user AI cost limits: Helicone gateway rate limits vs the in-process llmbrake library.

At a glance

Helicone LLMBrake
Request path Drawback: App → Helicone gateway → provider Advantage: App → provider
Prompts and responses Drawback: Stored by default (omit headers available; still sent through the gateway) Advantage: Never read; only metadata (customer, model, tokens, cost)
Per-user $ limit Advantage: Helicone-RateLimit-Policy: "500;w=3600;u=cents;s=user" + Helicone-User-Id Advantage: Monthly budgetUsd per customer, as a number or a function of plan
Window Drawback: Rolling window (minimum 60 s) Advantage: Calendar month, matching your billing
Near the limit Drawback: No model downgrade in the rate-limit feature Advantage: downgradeAt + downgradeMap
At the limit Drawback: 429 from the gateway Advantage: Typed BudgetExceededError before the provider is called
Cost Drawback: Free tier 10k requests/month; Pro $79/month + usage (cloud) Advantage: Free, MIT
Dashboards, request logs Advantage: Yes Soon Hosted dashboard, early access for founding members

Notes

  • Helicone per-user limits need the Helicone-User-Id header; limits can also be segmented by a custom property. Self-hostable (Apache 2.0). Pricing per Helicone's pricing page, October 2026.
  • LLMBrake v0.1.0 covers chat-completions-style usage. Verify the bundled price table against your provider. Concurrent calls can overshoot the cap slightly.

Sources

Disclosure: LLMBrake is our project. Helicone details from its docs, checked October 11, 2026. Corrections: issues.


Also compare: vs LiteLLM · vs Langfuse · all four approaches side by side